ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emotional Freedom Techniques for Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) for anxiety disorders, compared with conventional and alternative therapies.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across nine electronic databases up to February 2025, including only parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated EFT as a standalone intervention for anxiety symptoms. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.
resultsSeven RCTs with 506 participants were included. Populations ranged from clinical to non-clinical groups. EFT interventions varied in duration (1-56 sessions), with control groups including no treatment, supportive interviews, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), breathing therapy, and progressive muscle relaxation. All six studies comparing EFT to no intervention reported significant reductions in anxiety symptoms in favor of EFT. Compared to active controls, EFT showed similar or superior effects to breathing therapy and muscle relaxation but no significant difference from CBT. Most studies showed "some concerns" in risk of bias, mainly due to self-reported outcomes and lack of blinding.
conclusionsEFT appears to be a promising and safe complementary intervention for reducing anxiety symptoms, with additional benefits for related psychological outcomes. However, methodological limitations and heterogeneity among studies preclude firm conclusions. High-quality RCTs using standardized protocols and objective outcome measures are warranted to confirm these findings and to explore the effectiveness of EFT as an adjunct to conventional therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.