ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes: A Pilot Survey of Perspectives on the Utility and Documentation Burden in Palliative Medicine.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- For the record: a narrative review of ambient voice technology in clinical documentation for dentistry and wider healthcare.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Article
- The use of ambient voice technology (AVT) for clinician-patient consultations in healthcare practice: A rapid systematic scoping review.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThere is growing evidence to support ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes in healthcare to improve medical documentation by generating timely and comprehensive notes. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology, this study evaluated the utility and potential time savings of an ambient AI scribe, Scribeberry, (V2), in a palliative medicine outpatient setting, comparing it to the standard practice of dictation.
methodsThis prospective quality improvement study was conducted at an academic medical center by two palliative medicine resident physicians. Residents documented patient visits using a freely available ambient AI scribe software program, Scribeberry, as well as using standard dictation software. Primary outcome measures included the editing time for the AI scribe and the dictating and editing times for a dictated manuscript, as well as subjective assessments of the accuracy, organization, and overall usefulness of the AI-generated clinical letters.
resultsA heterogenous response was seen with the implementation of an AI scribe. One resident saw a statistically significant reduction (
conclusionsThis pilot study describes the use of an ambient AI scribe software program, Scribeberry, in the community palliative medicine context. Our results showed a mixed response with respect to time savings and improvements in the organization, accuracy, and overall clinical usefulness of the AI-generated notes over time. Given the small sample size and short study duration, this study is insufficiently powered to draw conclusions with respect to AI scribe benefits in real-world contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.