ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Health Professionals' Perceptions of Pacific Co-Designed Resources for Pacific Gout Patients.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Intermittent and Constant Pain Patterns in People With Gout: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- 'We gout your back': a qualitative study to co-design educational gout resources with Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPacific peoples in Aotearoa, New Zealand experience the highest burden of gout globally, yet there is still a lack of awareness and understanding of the disease. A Pacific community group and Pacific health professional network co-designed Pacific gout resources to improve understanding. The aim of this study is to identify and discuss the current state and perceptions of Pacific gout education, and explore health professionals' views on Pacific co-designed resources and their usefulness in clinical settings.
methodsThe Fa'afaletui model was utilised to conduct semi-structured Talanga interviews with 14 health professionals in Auckland, New Zealand who work in primary care clinics. The interview explored their views on providing gout education and on the feasibility of the Pacific co-designed gout resources. Talanga interviews were audio recorded and thematically analysed.
resultsOverall, health professionals responded positively to the co-designed resources, identifying the benefits of supporting primary care consultations and improving Pacific patients' understanding of gout. The key findings were summarised in five main themes: (1) health system barriers to gout education, (2) misleading information, (3) health professionals' experiences of providing health education, (4) general impressions of Pacific co-designed resources, and (5) the feasibility of Pacific co-designed educational resources in a clinical setting.
conclusionsThis study presents the views of health professionals in providing health education related to gout and on the feasibility of Pacific co-designed educational resources. It reinforces the significance of involving communities in the design and implementation of interventions to ensure they are culturally safe, relevant, and have long-term impacts on gout management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.