ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Real-Time Pig Weight Assessment and Carbon Footprint Monitoring Based on Computer Vision.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Specific Acoustic Parameters on Responses in Growing Pigs: Towards a Precision Auditory Enrichment Strategy.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Advancing climate-resilient livestock systems: Next-generation emission mitigation strategies and integrated technological innovations.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Low-Altitude UAV-Based Recognition of Porcine Facial Expressions for Early Health Monitoring.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing the carbon footprint in pig production is a fundamental technical basis for achieving carbon neutrality and peak carbon emissions. Only by systematically studying the carbon footprint can the goals of carbon neutrality and peak carbon emissions be effectively realized. This study aims to reduce the carbon footprint through optimized feeding strategies based on minimizing carbon emissions. To this end, this study conducted a full-lifecycle monitoring of the carbon footprint during pig growth from December 2024 to May 2025, optimizing feeding strategies using a real-time pig weight estimation model driven by deep learning to reduce resource consumption and the carbon footprint. We introduce EcoSegLite, a lightweight deep learning model designed for non-contact real-time pig weight estimation. By incorporating ShuffleNetV2, Linear Deformable Convolution (LDConv), and ACmix modules, it achieves high precision in resource-constrained environments with only 1.6 M parameters, attaining a 96.7% mAP50. Based on full-lifecycle weight monitoring of 63 pigs at the Pianguan farm from December 2024 to May 2025, the EcoSegLite model was integrated with a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework to optimize feeding management. This approach achieved a 7.8% reduction in feed intake, an 11.9% reduction in manure output, and a 5.1% reduction in carbon footprint. The resulting growth curves further validated the effectiveness of the optimized feeding strategy, while the reduction in feed and manure also potentially reduced water consumption and nitrogen runoff. This study offers a data-driven solution that enhances resource efficiency and reduces environmental impact, paving new pathways for precision agriculture and sustainable livestock production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.