Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941375›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Through Human Eyes: Owner Insights into the Social Relationships of Pet Rats.

Caitlin Walburn, Emily Blackwell, Mike Mendl, Elizabeth S Paul, Vikki Neville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlin WalburnBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-6414-5567
Emily BlackwellBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-7625
Mike MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Elizabeth S PaulBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Vikki NevilleBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-1353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the social relationships and behaviours of pet rats is important, particularly because they are comparatively understudied compared to their laboratory and wild counterparts, and little is known about their welfare. Here, open-ended interviews, with a particular focus on rat social relationships and behaviours, were conducted with 23 pet rat owners in the United Kingdom and a reflective thematic analysis was conducted on the resulting, transcribed dataset. Seven main themes were generated: Social Behaviours, Social Life and Group Dynamics, Introducing New Rats and Repairing Social Bonds, Owner Practices, Participant and Rat Contextual Background, Owner Narratives and Shared Understandings, and Owner Research Interests. Owners described rat social relationships and behaviours with a high level of consistency and reported the techniques they employ to manage the social dynamics of their rat groups, including the first scientific report of rat introductions. We propose that these qualitative findings can inform future research, including observational studies of captive (pet and non-pet) rat management and welfare.

Indexed as

animal welfarecompanion animalhuman–animal bondhuman–animal interactionratreflective thematic analysissocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID40941375
PMCPMC12427543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.