ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Development of IVF Porcine Embryos in Microwell Culture System.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in pig embryo production for cryopreservation, transfer and genome editing.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the development of IVF porcine embryos incubated in microwells of Well-of-the-Well (WOW) culture dishes. In Experiment 1, 500 embryos were cultured under five different culture conditions: 10 individual embryos in microwells covered by 50 μL PZM-3 medium (50 μL WOW); 10 embryos together in a well of 50 μL PZM-3 (50 μL Well); 10 embryos in microwells covered by 20 μL PZM-3 (20 μL WOW); 10 embryos in a well of 20 μL PZM-3 (20 μL Well); and 10 embryos in a 20 μL drop of PZM-3 in traditional dishes (control). In Experiment 2, the best-performing treatment group from Experiment 1 (50 μL WOW) was further compared to control using a total of 350 embryos. There was no difference in the percentage of cleaved embryos among the groups in both experiments. In Experiment 1, the percentage of blastocysts from 50 μL WOW (42.00 ± 6.29%) was higher (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.