Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941309›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Advancements in Individual Animal Identification: A Historical Perspective from Prehistoric Times to the Present.

Shiva Paudel, Tami Brown-Brandl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shiva PaudelDepartment of Biological System Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.
Tami Brown-BrandlDepartment of Biological System Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-8035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision livestock farming (PLF) is rapidly advancing, with a growing array of technologies being explored and implemented to improve both productivity and animal welfare. One of the major challenges in this field is the identification of individual animals. Despite numerous efforts having been made to automate this process, there remains a lack of holistic reviews that comprehensively integrate and evaluate these technological developments. Historically, humans have employed various techniques to identify individual animals. This article provides an overview of the evolution of animal identification methods, highlighting significant transitions across various time periods. In prehistoric times, identification relied solely on visual inspection. Today, advanced methods are being utilized, such as radio frequency identification (RFID), computer vision-based systems, biometric recognition, and DNA profiling. Each identification method has its own strengths and limitations. Interestingly, early methods such as visual inspection and drawing can still inspire the development of novel automated systems when combined with modern technologies.

Indexed as

computer vision for animal identificationindividual animal identificationprecision livestock farming (PLF)radio frequency identification (RFID)

Identifiers

PMID40941309
PMCPMC12427451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.