Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941298›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Efficacy and Underpinnings of the Effigy in Wildlife Management.

Bryan M Kluever, Mary J Foley

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bryan M KlueverU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Florida Field Station, 2820 East University Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32641, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8417-4339
Mary J FoleyU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 2820 East University Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-2345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Displaying representations or actual individuals of the same or similar species can have a congregating or deterring effect on animals. An effigy, an animal or animal representation in a moribund state, is a tool aimed at deterring target animals in wildlife management settings. Despite being used as a deterrent for decades, neither a synthesis of effigies nor an exploration of the behavioral drivers tied to effigy effectiveness has occurred. We reviewed the effigy literature in terms of both efficacy as a deterrent and behavioral driver(s). We examined research on effigies encompassing 13 social avian species. Nine of seventeen (53%) investigations included experimentation and statistical validation, and of those, six of nine (66%) found effigies to be effective at deterring the focal species, though the temporal scale and spatial extents of the investigations were highly variable. We argue that central to an effigy's effectiveness is the elicitation of fear in the target animal(s) and propose and discuss several potential drivers of fear derived from an effigy, namely antipredator behavior, neophobia, and disgust. Only a single study discussed behavioral drivers of effigy response. We conclude that effigies show promise as a wildlife deterrent for social avian species and have potential for uninvestigated species, and greater efforts should be made to incorporate robust study designs capable of strong inference and elucidation of behavioral drivers of an animal's response to an effigy.

Indexed as

antipredatoraviandeterrentdisgustfearneophobia

Identifiers

PMID40941298
PMCPMC12427257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.