ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Disease Prediction in Cattle: A Mixed-Methods Review of Predictive Modeling Studies.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive models use historical data to predict a future event and can be applied to a wide variety of tasks. A broader evaluation of the cattle literature is required to better understand predictive model performance across various health challenges and to understand data types utilized to train models. This narrative review aims to describe predictive model performance in greater detail across various disease outcomes, input data types, and algorithms with a specific focus on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. A secondary goal is to address important areas for consideration for future work in the beef cattle sector. In total, 19 articles were included. Broad categories of disease were covered, including respiratory disease, bovine tuberculosis, and others. Various input data types were reported, including demographic data, images, and laboratory test results, among others. Several algorithms were utilized, including neural networks, linear models, and others. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values ranged widely across disease outcome and algorithm categories. Negative predictive values were greater than positive predictive values for most disease outcomes. This review highlights the importance of utilizing several performance metrics and concludes that future work should address prevalence of outcomes and class-imbalanced data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.