Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941247›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Differences in Hydration Behavior and Physicochemical Properties of Starches from Different Sorghum Varieties and Their Multiple Relationships.

Jun Mao, Jihong Li, Hongdong Yan, Qun Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun MaoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Jihong LiJilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Gongzhuling 136100, China.
Hongdong YanInstitute of Crop Resources, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China.
Qun ShenCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-6104

Funding

National Modern Agricultural Millet Sorghum Industrial Technology cars-06-14.5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physicochemical properties of sorghum determine its application. This study investigated the differences and relationships in the physicochemical properties of four typical japonica sorghum starches (JSS, including JZ159, JZ167, JZ169 and FZ4) and three waxy sorghum starches (WSS, including JN, LML and NL). The results showed that there were significant differences in their hydration properties, thermal properties, gelatinisation properties and digestibility. The water solubility index (WSI) of all starches was positively related to the swelling power (SP). With the increase in temperature (75-95 °C), the SP values of JSS and WSS samples increased significantly, and the SP of WSS samples was higher than that of JSS samples. Before 60 min, the digestibility of JZ159 and JZ167 was significantly lower. At 180 min of digestion, the digestibility of all starches was close (87.49-93.15%). At different temperatures, the SP and WSI values of WSS samples were significantly correlated with the predicted glycemic index (pGI), resistant starch (RS) and rapidly digestible starch (RDS), while the relationships among these parameters in JSS samples varied with temperature. This study also revealed the hydration characteristics of different sorghum starches and the influence of their hydration behaviours on physicochemical and digestive properties.

Indexed as

digestive propertieshydration behaviourjaponica sorghum starchphysicochemical propertieswax sorghum starch

Identifiers

PMID40941247
PMCPMC12428242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.