ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Feasibility of Artificial Intelligence and Raman Spectroscopy for Determining the Authenticity of Minced Meat.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meat Adulteration in the MENA and GCC Regions: A Scoping Review of Risks, Detection Technologies, and Regulatory Challenges.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food fraud in meat products presents serious economic and public health challenges, underscoring the need for rapid and reliable detection methods. This study investigates the potential of Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning to accurately discriminate between pure and mixed minced meat preparations. We evaluated three classification algorithms: Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Random Forests (RFs). Raman spectra were collected from 19 distinct samples consisting of different ratios of pork, beef, and lamb minced meat. Our findings suggest that homogenization markedly enhances spectral consistency and classification accuracy. In the pure meat samples case, all three models (SVM, ANN, and RF) achieved notable increases in classification accuracies (from 0.50-0.70 to above 0.85), a dramatic improvement over unhomogenized samples. In more complex homogenized mixtures, SVM delivered the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of up to 0.88 for 50:50 mixtures and 0.86 for multi-ratio samples, often outperforming both ANN and RF. While the underlying interpretation of the classification models remains complex, the findings consistently underscore the critical role of homogenization on model performance. This work demonstrates the robust potential of the Raman spectroscopy-coupled machine learning approach for the rapid and accurate identification of minced meat species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.