Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941167›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Effect of Pressing Process on Metabolomics Profiling and Sensory Properties: A Comparative Study of Fu Brick Tea Versus Fu Loose Tea from Identical Raw Dark Tea.

Yan Liang, Jialin Zou, Fanhua Wu, Xiaofang Zhu, Xin Hu, Haoan Zhao, Wei Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan LiangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Jialin ZouCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7846-4186
Fanhua WuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.
Xiaofang ZhuKey Laboratory of Fu Tea Processing and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xianyang 712044, China.
Xin HuKey Laboratory of Fu Tea Processing and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xianyang 712044, China.
Haoan ZhaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-9385
Wei CaoCollege of Food Science and Technology, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fu tea is a unique microbially fermented tea from China, and has two types. The primary distinction between these two types-Fu brick tea (FBT) and Fu loose tea (FLT)-is that FBT is compressed into bricks, whereas FLT is maintained as loose leaves. To investigate the differences in the chemical composition and sensory characteristics between the two types of Fu tea, this study utilized samples produced from the same batch of raw dark tea material to ensure comparability. Multiple analytical approaches were applied, including main active component analysis, sensory flavor evaluation, metabolomics, and differential characteristic component analysis. These methods were employed to comprehensively compare and characterize the two tea types. The results showed that compared to FBT, FLT exhibited a longer-lasting fungal flower aroma and a mellower taste. Furthermore, the quantity of

Indexed as

catechinFu brick teaFu loose teagallic acidmetabolomicsraw dark tea

Identifiers

PMID40941167
PMCPMC12428677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.