ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Eco-Friendly Extraction of Olive Leaf Phenolics and Terpenes: A Comparative Performance Analysis Against Conventional Methods.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Ultrasound-Assisted and Supercritical COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Phenolic Constituents Drive Antimicrobial and Antibiotic-Enhancing Activities ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study focuses on recovering phenolic compounds and terpenes from olive leaves, which are generated as by-products during olive oil processing. To this end, conventional extraction/maceration (CE) and advanced extraction techniques such as subcritical water extraction (SWE), pressurized fluid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) were employed to compare and determine the most effective procedure. The phenolic and terpenoid composition of the extracts revealed a total of 33 compounds in HPLC-QTOF-MS analysis. According to these findings, the optimal extraction techniques for the maximum recovery of secoiridoids from olive leaves were PLE and UAE, with no significant difference between them (21.9891 ± 2.5521 mg/g DW and 21.0888 ± 1.3494 mg/g DW, respectively). Regarding to flavonoids, UAE was the most effective extraction technique, yielding 4.9837 ± 0.6739 mg/g DW. However, SWE recovered the highest amount of phenolic alcohols (7.4201 ± 0.9848 mg/g DW), which could be due to degradation of the secoiridoids during extraction. Conversely, UAE was more successful than the other techniques for the extraction of the terpene family (0.7373 ± 0.0601 mg/g DW). The present study therefore focuses on comparing different extraction techniques for revalorizing olive leaves as a source of bioactive compounds, specifically polyphenols and terpenes, due to their beneficial health properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.