ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Nanostructure-Engineered Optical and Electrochemical Biosensing Toward Food Safety Assurance.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidics-Integrated Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Safety and Quality Assessment: From Complex-Matrix Processing to On-Site Decision-Making.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SERS-Based Detection of Food Contaminants: From Laboratory Sensitivity to Practical Implementation-Bottlenecks and Pathways to Standardization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bio-Based Smart Packaging Materials for Next-Generation Food Systems.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy combined microfluidic analytical devices for on-site food safety analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Review
- Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for the Detection of Milk Adulterants.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Tracking Cadmium Transfer from Soil to Cup: An Electrochemical Sensing Strategy Based on BiFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Considering the necessity of food safety testing, various biosensors have been developed based on biological elements (e.g., antibodies, aptamers), chemical elements (e.g., molecularly imprinted polymers), physical elements (e.g., nanopores) as recognition substances. According to the sensing patterns of signal transduction, the biosensors could be classified into optical and electrochemical biosensing, including fluorescence sensing, Raman sensing, colorimetric sensing, electrochemical sensing, etc. To enhance the sensing sensitivity, kinds of nanomaterials have been applied for signal amplification. With merits of high selectivity, sensitivity, and accuracy, the sensing strategies have been widely applied for food safety testing. This review highlights their signal output behavior, (e.g., fluorescence intensity shifts, Raman peak alterations, colorimetric changes, electrochemical current/voltage/impedance variations), nanostructure-mediated amplification mechanisms, and the fundamental recognition principles. Future efforts should prioritize multiplexed assay platforms, integration with microfluidics and smart devices, novel biorecognition elements, and sustainable manufacturing. Emerging synergies between biosensors and AI-driven data analytics promise intelligent monitoring systems for predictive food safety management, addressing challenges in food matrix compatibility and real-time hazard identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.