ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dissipation Behavior and Risk Assessment of Three Pesticide Residues Under Combined Application in Greenhouse-Grown Cabbage.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Field residue trials were conducted in greenhouse-grown cabbage at both recommended and double dosages to evaluate the degradation dynamics and dietary risks of three pesticides (azoxystrobin, thiamethoxam, and carbendazim). In this study, a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was developed to measure the residues of three pesticides in cabbage. The mean recoveries of three pesticides in cabbage were 82.5-104.2%, with relative standard deviations of 2.1-5.2%, meeting the requirements of residual analysis. Based on first-order kinetics, the half-lives of the three pesticides in cabbage were 11.55-33.00 d under field conditions. The health risks associated with three pesticides in cabbage were evaluated using the risk quotient (RQ) method and the EFSA PRIMo 3.1 model. In the final residue experiment, the dietary exposure risks of azoxystrobin and thiamethoxam were all acceptable for children and adults regardless of the dosage or pre-harvest intervals, with the risk quotient (RQ) ranging from 0.040 to 0.363 and 0.022 to 0.417, respectively. However, carbendazim intake posed unacceptable health risks for consumers, with RQ significantly exceeding 1. The EFSA PRIMo 3.1 model also indicated high %ADI values for carbendazim, consistent with the RQ results. Given the significant residual risk associated with carbendazim in cabbage, limiting its use on this crop is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.