ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated Spectral Preprocessing via Bayesian Optimization for Chemometric Analysis of Milk Constituents.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active learning sequential surrogate-based optimization (AL-SSBO) versus response surface methodology in sunflower oil diacylglycerol synthesis: Performance and insight into AL-SSBO.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Authentication of Maltese Pork Meat Unveiling Insights Through ATR-FTIR and Chemometric Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The preprocessing of infrared spectra can significantly improve predictive accuracy for protein, carbohydrate, lipid, or other nutrition components, yet optimal preprocessing selection is typically empirical, tedious, and dataset specific. This study introduces a Bayesian optimization-based framework designed for the automated selection of optimal spectral preprocessing pipelines within a chemometric modeling context. The framework was applied to mid-infrared spectra of milk to predict compositional parameters for fat, protein, lactose, and total solids. A total of 385 averaged spectra corresponding to 198 unique samples was split into a 70/30 ratio (training/test) using a group-aware Kennard-Stone algorithm, resulting in 269 averaged spectra (135 unique samples) for training and 116 spectra (58 unique samples) for testing. Six regression models: Elastic Net, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Partial Least Squares (PLS), RidgeCV Regression, LassoLarsCV, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were evaluated across three preprocessing conditions: (1) no preprocessing, (2) literature-derived custom preprocessing (e.g., MSC, SNV, and first and second derivatives), and (3) optimized preprocessing via the proposed Bayesian framework. Optimized preprocessing consistently outperformed other methods, with RidgeCV achieving the best performance for all components except lactose, where PLS slightly outperformed it. Improvements in predictive accuracy, particularly in terms of RMSEP were observed across all milk components. The best RMSEP results were achieved for protein (RMSEP = 0.054, R2=0.981) and lactose (RMSEP = 0.026, R2=0.917), followed by fat (RMSEP = 0.139, R2=0.926) and total solids (RMSEP = 0.154, R2=0.960). Literature-based pipelines demonstrated inconsistent effectiveness, highlighting the limitations of transferring preprocessing methods between datasets. The Bayesian optimization approach identified relatively simple yet highly effective preprocessing pipelines, typically involving few steps. By eliminating manual trial and error, this data-driven strategy offers a robust and generalizable solution that streamlines spectral modeling in dairy analysis and can be readily applied to other types of spectroscopic data across various domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.