ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Food-Derived Carbon Dots: Formation, Detection, and Impact on Gut Microbiota.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterial-mediated functional remodeling of antigen-presenting cells: A novel strategy to break tumor immune escape.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Antioxidant Performance and Characterization Comparison of Carbon Dots Derived from Agricultural Waste Pineapple Peel.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Novel Carbon Dots Nanomaterials for the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Mechanisms and Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Carbon Dots as Multifunctional Nanomaterials: A Review on Antimicrobial Activities and Fluorescence-Based Microbial Detection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-derived carbon dots (F-CDs) are a novel class of carbon-based nanomaterials unintentionally generated during common thermal food processing techniques, such as baking, roasting, frying, and caramelization. These nanostructures exhibit unique optical and chemical properties, including photoluminescence, high aqueous solubility, and tunable surface functionality, making them increasingly relevant to both food science and biomedical research. Recent studies have highlighted their ability to interact with biological systems, particularly the gut microbiota, a critical determinant of host metabolism, immunity, and overall health. This review critically summarizes the current understanding of F-CDs, including their mechanisms of formation, analytical detection methods, and physicochemical properties. It explores their biological fate in the gastrointestinal tract, encompassing absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, with a focus on their stability and cellular uptake. Special attention is given to the interaction between F-CDs and the gut microbiota, where evidence suggests both beneficial (e.g., anti-inflammatory, antioxidant) and detrimental (e.g., dysbiosis, inflammatory signaling) effects, depending on the CD type, dose, and exposure context. Additionally, this review addresses toxicological concerns, highlighting gaps in long-term safety data, standardized detection methods, and regulatory oversight. The dual role of F-CDs-as potential modulators of the microbiota and as emerging dietary nanomaterials with uncharted risks-underscores the need for further interdisciplinary research. Future efforts should aim to refine detection protocols, assess chronic exposure outcomes, and clarify structure-function relationships to enable the safe and responsible application of these nanomaterials in food and health contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.