Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40941041›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Residual Characteristics and Processing Factors of Flubendiamide and Tebufenozide in Rice and Its Processed Products.

Dongju Kim, Eunbeen Oh, Seunghyeon Jo, Hyeonwoo Shin, Youngjin Ham, Junyoung Kim, Mihyun Cho, Moohyeog Im, Keesung Kyung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dongju KimDepartment of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Eunbeen OhDepartment of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.
Seunghyeon JoAnalytical Research Group, Translational Toxicology Research Division, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jeongeup 56212, Republic of Korea.
Hyeonwoo ShinResidue GLP Research Team, Research Institute, NongHyup Chemical, Okcheon 29008, Republic of Korea.
Youngjin HamResidue Study Division, AB Solution, Hwaseong 18514, Republic of Korea.
Junyoung KimRegulation Team, Development & Marketing Department, Sungbo, Seoul 06174, Republic of Korea.
Mihyun ChoDepartment of Food Engineering, College of Engineering, Daegu University, Gyeongsan 38453, Republic of Korea.
Moohyeog ImDepartment of Food Engineering, College of Engineering, Daegu University, Gyeongsan 38453, Republic of Korea.
Keesung KyungDepartment of Environmental and Biological Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Life and Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety This research was supported by a grant (22192MFDS322) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2024.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate residue changes in flubendiamide and tebufenozide during the processing of whole grain into milled rice, cooked rice, and rice cake, and to calculate their processing factors (PFs). For the processing study, pesticides were applied at three times the recommended rate based on Korea's good agricultural practice (GAP), and processed products were prepared using conventional methods. Residual pesticide analysis was performed using a modified QuEChERS method and LC-MS/MS. The residue analysis method was validated based on parameters including LOQ, linearity, and accuracy at the LOQ, 10LOQ, and MRL levels, with the LOQ set at 0.01 mg/kg for all samples. During milling, which removes the hull, more than 90% of the pesticide residues were eliminated. Additional reductions exceeding 50% were observed during cooking and rice cake processing. All PFs, except for those in the hulls, were less than 1, indicating that processing reduces pesticide levels. Despite the use of threefold the GAP rate, the %ADI values for all processed products remained below 1%, suggesting negligible dietary risk. These findings provide scientific evidence supporting the safety of processed rice products regarding pesticide residues and highlight the importance of considering processing effects in dietary exposure assessments.

Indexed as

LC-MS/MSpesticide residueprocessingricerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40941041
PMCPMC12427707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.