Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940998›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Personalization in Breast Cancer Screening: From Population Models to Individualized Protocols.

Filippo Pesapane, Luca Nicosia, Lucrezia D'Amelio, Giulia Quercioli, Mariassunta Roberta Pannarale, Francesca Priolo, Irene Marinucci, Maria Giorgia Farina, Silvia Penco, Valeria Dominelli and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. How Does ACR BI-RADSDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Filippo PesapaneBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0374-5054
Luca NicosiaBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-8075
Lucrezia D'AmelioDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, SC Radiologia, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Giulia QuercioliPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Mariassunta Roberta PannaralePostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Francesca PrioloBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Irene MarinucciBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Maria Giorgia FarinaBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Silvia PencoBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Valeria DominelliBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Anna RotiliBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-9275
Lorenza MeneghettiBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Anna Carla BozziniBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Sonia SanticchiaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, SC Radiologia, IRCCS Cà Granda Fondazione Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-8939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional breast cancer screening programs are predominantly age-based, applying uniform intervals and modalities across broad populations. While this model has reduced mortality, it entails harms-including overdiagnosis, false positives, and missed interval cancers-prompting interest in risk-stratified approaches. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical enabler of this paradigm shift. This narrative review examines how AI-driven tools are advancing breast cancer screening toward personalization, with a focus on mammographic risk models, multimodal risk prediction, and AI-enabled clinical decision support. We reviewed studies published from 2015 to 2025, prioritizing large cohorts, randomized trials, and prospective validations. AI-based mammographic risk models generally improve discrimination versus classical models and are being externally validated; however, evidence remains heterogeneous across subtypes and populations. Emerging multimodal models integrate genetics, clinical data, and imaging; AI is also being evaluated for triage and personalized intervals within clinical workflows. Barriers remain-explainability, regulatory validation, and equity. Widespread adoption will depend on prospective clinical benefit, regulatory alignment, and careful integration. Overall, AI-based mammographic risk models generally improve discrimination versus classical models and are being externally validated; however, evidence remains heterogeneous across molecular subtypes, with signals strongest for ER-positive disease and limited data for fast-growing and interval cancers. Prospective trials demonstrating outcome benefit and safe interval modification are still pending. Accordingly, adoption should proceed with safeguards, equity monitoring, and clear separation between risk prediction, lesion detection, triage, and decision-support roles.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast cancer screeningclinical decisionmammographypersonalized medicinerisk stratificationsupport systems

Identifiers

PMID40940998
PMCPMC12428423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.