ArticleCancers2025
Proton Beam Therapy Provides Longer Survival and Preserves Muscle Mass in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to TACE+RFA.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of Skeletal Muscle Loss in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with TACE-Based Combination Therapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProton beam therapy (PBT) provides excellent tumor control with minimal hepatic toxicity in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), by minimizing radiation exposure to non-cancerous liver tissue. Progressive skeletal muscle loss, often seen in cirrhosis and HCC, can negatively impact treatment outcomes and survival. This study compared the efficacy and safety of PBT with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with unresectable HCC.
methodsA total of 91 patients (PBT/TACE+RFA,
resultsPBT resulted in longer overall survival (OS) and fewer hepatic and systemic adverse events compared to TACE+RFA, with no grade 3 or higher toxicities observed in the PBT group. Importantly, psoas muscle size remained stable after PBT, even in patients with tumors ≥ 3 cm, whereas TACE+RFA led to significant muscle loss regardless of tumor size, which was associated with poorer prognosis. These findings suggest that, for patients with unresectable HCC not adequately controlled by RFA alone, PBT may improve OS and help preserve muscle mass, while offering lower toxicity and more favorable clinical outcomes than TACE+RFA.
conclusionsOverall, PBT may represent an effective strategy for managing unresectable HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.