Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940931›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Comprehensive Review.

Sebastian Winiarski, Marcin Radziszewski, Maciej Wiśniewski, Jakub Cisek, Dariusz Wąsowski, Dariusz Plewczyński, Katarzyna Górska, Piotr Korczyński

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastian WiniarskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin RadziszewskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-3099
Maciej WiśniewskiFaculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub CisekFaculty of Computer Science, Polish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology, 02-008 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-5494-6346
Dariusz WąsowskiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz PlewczyńskiFaculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-7610
Katarzyna GórskaDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Thoracic Oncology and Transplantology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr KorczyńskiDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Thoracic Oncology and Transplantology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2826-4430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly investigated as a potential adjunct in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer, particularly through integration with bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS). Deep learning models have been applied to modalities such as white-light imaging, autofluorescence bronchoscopy, and spectroscopy, with the aim of assisting lesion detection, standardizing interpretation, and reducing interobserver variability. AI has also been explored in EBUS for lymph node assessment and guidance of transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), with preliminary studies suggesting possible improvements in diagnostic yield. However, current evidence remains largely confined to small, retrospective, single-center datasets, often reporting performance under idealized conditions. External validation is rare, reproducibility is undermined by a lack of data and code availability, and workflow integration into real-world bronchoscopy practice has not been demonstrated. As such, most systems should still be regarded as experimental. Translating AI into routine thoracic oncology will require large-scale, prospective, multicenter validation studies, greater data transparency, and careful evaluation of cost-effectiveness, regulatory approval, and clinical utility.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)bronchoscopydeep learning (DL)endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID40940931
PMCPMC12427279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.