ReviewCancers2025
Ribosomal RNA Degradation (RNA Disruption) in Tumour Cells: Mechanistic Insights and Potential Clinical Utility.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ribosome in eukaryotic cells is a macromolecular complex composed of four ribonucleic acids and over 80 proteins. This organelle facilitates protein synthesis in cells, and its activity is strongly upregulated in human cancers. Immune cells, a variety of cellular stressors and numerous structurally and mechanistically distinct anti-cancer agents have been shown to induce ribosomal RNA degradation in tumour cells in vitro and in vivo-a phenomenon we termed "RNA disruption". RNA disruption can be quantified in cultured cell lines and patient samples using the RNA disruption assay (RDA). Unlike well-known high-throughput anti-cancer drug sensitivity assays, RDA can distinguish between dying and arrested tumour cells, making it an attractive assay for anti-cancer drug discovery and development. Low tumour RNA disruption during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (as measured using RDA) is strongly associated with residual disease and reduced disease-free survival, making it a potentially valuable chemo-resistance assessment tool. High RNA disruption may also indicate chemo-responsiveness. RDA holds the prospect of being a useful tool to escalate or de-escalate neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cancer patients. Moreover, the assay's ability to predict treatment outcomes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy may permit its use in adaptive clinical trials and in drug approval by regulatory agencies. This review provides insight into the cellular processes involved in chemotherapy-induced RNA disruption. It also describes the results of clinical studies on tumour RNA disruption in cancer patients and suggests possible approaches that could be considered for the utilization of RDAs in the clinical management of breast cancer patients undergoing current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.