Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940838›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

A Review of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Risk Factors, Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies.

Jurgis Alvikas, Shakti Dahiya, Genia Dubrovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jurgis AlvikasDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1167-6546
Shakti DahiyaDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Genia DubrovskyDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-0382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious yet far too common complication following distal pancreatectomy (DP), as it affects 20-30% of patients after DP. POPF raises the risk of other complications and causes delays to a patient's oncologic care. In this review, we present the latest data on patient risk factors for developing POPF, such as obesity, smoking, young age, thick pancreas, lack of epidural anesthesia, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated drain amylase levels. Other risk factors that have been identified with irregular consistency include open surgical approach, non-malignant or neuroendocrine tumor pathology, simultaneous splenectomy, simultaneous vascular resection, and long operative time. We also review the consequences of POPF, which include hemorrhage, infection, delayed gastric emptying, re-operation, re-admission, delays in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, reduced progression-free survival, and reduced overall survival. Finally, we present strategies that have been studied for avoiding POPF after DP, including reducing pressure at the sphincter of Oddi, the use of sealants and patches, optimizing pancreatic transection, strategies for post-operative drain placement, the use of post-operative somatostatin analogues, and pre-clinical studies of experimental devices and techniques that may inform future trials. This review informs readers on the current state of the art with regard to POPF after DP and sets the stage for future studies to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

distal pancreatectomypancreatic cancerpost-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF)surgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40940838
PMCPMC12427430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.