ReviewCancers2025
A Review of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Risk Factors, Consequences, and Mitigation Strategies.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Video-based OSATS and GEARS assessment of pancreatic transection and stump closure predicts clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after robotic distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Perioperative changes in systemic inflammatory markers predict major complications after distal pancreatectomy.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Achievement of the Ideal Outcome After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Earlier Initiation and Higher Completion Rates of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Improved Long-Term Survival.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Somatostatin and its analogs in the management of postoperative pancreatic fistulas: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Review
- Is Kangduo robotic distal pancreatectomy more economically efficient and effective in postoperative outcomes compared to laparoscopic surgery? A propensity-matched analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The Effect of Splenectomy on Postoperative Morbidity and Survival in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious yet far too common complication following distal pancreatectomy (DP), as it affects 20-30% of patients after DP. POPF raises the risk of other complications and causes delays to a patient's oncologic care. In this review, we present the latest data on patient risk factors for developing POPF, such as obesity, smoking, young age, thick pancreas, lack of epidural anesthesia, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated drain amylase levels. Other risk factors that have been identified with irregular consistency include open surgical approach, non-malignant or neuroendocrine tumor pathology, simultaneous splenectomy, simultaneous vascular resection, and long operative time. We also review the consequences of POPF, which include hemorrhage, infection, delayed gastric emptying, re-operation, re-admission, delays in adjuvant chemotherapy initiation, reduced progression-free survival, and reduced overall survival. Finally, we present strategies that have been studied for avoiding POPF after DP, including reducing pressure at the sphincter of Oddi, the use of sealants and patches, optimizing pancreatic transection, strategies for post-operative drain placement, the use of post-operative somatostatin analogues, and pre-clinical studies of experimental devices and techniques that may inform future trials. This review informs readers on the current state of the art with regard to POPF after DP and sets the stage for future studies to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.