ReviewCells2025
Numerical Modelling of Keratinocyte Behaviour: A Comprehensive Review of Biochemical and Mechanical Frameworks.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination keratinocytes and fibroblasts cell-based therapy in wound healing: a literature review.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratinocytes are the primary cells of the epidermis layer in our skin. They play a crucial role in maintaining skin health, responding to injuries, and counteracting disease progression. Understanding their behaviour is essential for advancing wound healing therapies, improving outcomes in regenerative medicine, and developing numerical models that accurately mimic skin deformation. To create physically representative models, it is essential to evaluate the nuanced ways in which keratinocytes deform, interact, and respond to mechanical and biochemical signals. This has prompted researchers to investigate various computational methods that capture these dynamics effectively. This review summarises the main mathematical and biomechanical modelling techniques (with particular focus on the literature published since 2010). It includes reaction-diffusion frameworks, finite element analysis, viscoelastic models, stochastic simulations, and agent-based approaches. We also highlight how machine learning is being integrated to accelerate model calibration, improve image-based analyses, and enhance predictive simulations. While these models have significantly improved our understanding of keratinocyte function, many approaches rely on idealised assumptions. These may be two-dimensional unicellular analysis, simplistic material properties, or uncoupled analyses between mechanical and biochemical factors. We discuss the need for multiscale, integrative modelling frameworks that bridge these computational and experimental approaches. A more holistic representation of keratinocyte behaviour could enhance the development of personalised therapies, improve disease modelling, and refine bioengineered skin substitutes for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.