ArticleCells2025
Characterizing Microglial Morphology: Methodological Advances in Confocal Imaging and Analysis.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to manganese during juvenile development increases microglial activation in the hippocampus following systemic infection with A/California/04/2009 Influenza A H1N1 virus.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Brain cell-released Cyclophilin A induces neuroinflammation and exacerbates blood-brain barrier injury in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microglia are central to neuroimmune responses and undergo dynamic structural and functional changes in models of stress and addiction, and in response to pharmacological treatments. While transcriptomic and proteomic assays provide insights into molecular profiles, morphological analysis remains a valuable proxy for assessing region-specific microglial response. However, morphological features alone often fail to capture the full complexity of microglial function, underscoring the need for standardized methods and complementary approaches. Here, we describe a standardized imaging pipeline for analyzing microglia in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcore), integrating unbiased confocal image acquisition with precise anatomical reference points. We compare two widely used image analysis platforms-IMARIS and CellSelect-3DMorph-highlighting their workflows, output metrics, and utility in quantifying microglial morphology following treatment with adenosine triphosphate (ATP). Both tools detect well described features of microglial dynamics, though they differ in automation level, analysis speed, and output types. Our findings demonstrate that both platforms provide reliable morphological data, with CellSelect-3DMorph offering a rapid, open-access alternative for high-throughput analysis. Additionally, using software-derived parameters in principal component analysis clustering has proven useful for identifying distinct subpopulations of microglia separated by their morphology. This work provides a practical framework for morphological analysis and promotes reproducibility in microglial studies under environmental and pharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.