ArticleBMC health services research2025
Implementation and development of an embedded researcher program driven by rural health services: a qualitative exploratory case study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practice-based cardiovascular research in rural primary care: research priorities and implementation insights.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Building Rural Health Research Capacity Through Embedded Researchers and Ecosystem Development.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbedding researchers in healthcare settings is a strategy used to close the gap between research and practice. Existing research pays little attention to the factors related to the implementation, development, and outcomes of embedded researcher programs in rural healthcare settings. There are additional challenges to embedding research in rural health practice, including enduring workforce shortages and limited research resources. This case study aimed to describe the implementation, development, and the types of outcomes of a rural and regional embedded researcher program, comprising three research translation coordinator (RTC) roles implemented in rural health services by an academic health science centre (AHSC).
methodsThis exploratory case study was informed by multiple data sources: the RTCs (n = 4; 100%); their employing health service chief executive officers (n = 3; 100%), and the implementing AHSC's executive officers (n = 2; 100%). Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews, RTCs' written activity reports, and impact case examples developed by the RTCs. Data were analysed using a team-based five stage framework approach.
resultsData collected included eight semi-structured interviews, fifteen activity reports and six impact case examples. Analysis of these data informed three themes and sub-themes: (1) Enabling and challenging implementation factors coded to two sub-themes (Rural health service ownership and Region-wide implementation) (2), Development of the rural embedded research translation coordinator role, comprising three sub-themes (Emerging and responsive to health service needs; Supporting translation of research, and Engaging strategic partners, and (3) Types of outcomes of the rural embedded research translation coordinator program at four levels (Rural clinician-researcher; Rural RTC; Organisation, and Region-wide or AHSC-levels).
conclusionsThe rural embedded researcher program represents an evolving, yet ostensibly successful initiative implemented across a large rural and regional area. The RTCs were employed by and accountable to a rural health service, and worked as a team while simultaneously collaborating with partner regional health services and universities. This rural health-service driven embedded researcher program operated within a collectivist framework to produce different types of outcomes for clinicians and researchers, health services, and the region. These findings will inform policymakers and organisations concerned with improving research and practice in rural and other resource-constrained health settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.