ArticleReproductive health2025
The psychosocial impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on frontline staff providing sexual health and family planning services in Kenya: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through global partnerships: the case of the HRP Alliance for research capacity strengthening.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Pandemic lessons: protecting sexual and reproductive health during global health emergencies.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Evidence on sexual and reproductive health service delivery during and post COVID-19: a multi-country facility assessment.Reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe recognition of the unintended impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures to the availability of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services led to the initiation of mitigation and health systems support mechanisms within public health facilities by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Kenya to maintain pre-Covid-19 levels of SRH service provision. These recovery mechanisms however concentrated on policy and infrastructural elements of service provision with limited attention given to the psychosocial impacts of COVID-19 on health care workers (HCWs). This paper examines the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on front line family planning (FP) and sexually transmitted infections (STI) management HCWs and their coping mechanisms with a view to suggesting ways in which HCWs can be supported during future pandemics. METHODOLOGY: This paper employs a mixed methods approach with quantitative methodology analyzing data on the preparedness of the health sector to maintain service provision levels and qualitative data examining the mental and psychosocial states of HCWs who provide FP and STI health care services within Kenyan public health facilities.
resultsOur main finding was that the psychosocial wellbeing of HCWs was majorly neglected in the government response mechanisms for the pandemic leading to burnout and depression, as well as HCWs absconding their duties in the initial stages of the pandemic, and avoidance of testing and disclosure of status as the pandemic progressed. Some of these mechanisms undermined the mitigation measures by the government and put patients and colleagues at risk of infection by HCWs whose COVID-19 status remained unknown.
conclusionsWe recommend that future responses include mechanisms that address the psychosocial wellbeing of HCWs as a core element of the response for effective management of pandemics. In the case of new and unprecedented pandemics such as COVID-19, it is important that HCWs are provided with accurate and timely information about the pandemic as well as to what is expected of their conduct in service delivery and in the promotion of a culture of risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.