ArticleFolia microbiologica2025
Study of the gut microbial diversity of Mytilus coruscus with different growth rates.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic and Functional Diversity of Pseudoalteromonas Associated with the Tropical Bivalve Anadara tuberculosa.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To examine intestinal microbiota-growth rate relationships in Mytilus coruscus, we analyzed genetically similar individuals under uniform aquaculture conditions using 16S rRNA sequencing, comparing fast-growing (L) and slow-growing (S) groups. Results demonstrated that Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota were the dominant phyla in the intestine of M. coruscus, and Pseudoalteromonas and Vibrio were the dominant genera. The relative abundances of Proteobacteria (84.30%) and Pseudoalteromonas (44.64%) in group L were significantly higher than those in group S (69.50% and 15.41% respectively), while the relative abundances of Bacteroidota (9.49%) and Tenacibaculum (2.21%) in group L were significantly lower than those in group S (19.42% and 4.54% respectively) (p < 0.05). In terms of diversity analysis, the microbial α diversity (Shannon and Simpson indices) in group L was significantly lower than that in group S. Beta diversity analysis (PCoA and PERMANOVA) showed that there were significant differences in the intestinal microbiota structure between group L and group S. Pearson correlation analysis further found that the relative abundance of Amphritea was significantly positively (r = 0.78-0.81, p < 0.05) correlated with the growth rate of M. coruscus, while Tenacibaculum was significantly negatively (r = -0.72-0.73, p < 0.05) correlated. In addition, functional prediction via PICRUSt indicates Amphritea may promote growth by enhancing host nutrient metabolism, while Tenacibaculum enrichment might hinder host development through resource competition or metabolic interference. This study demonstrates the association between M. coruscus growth rate and gut microbiota, provides a basis for promoting its growth by regulating the intestinal microbiota, and holds significant reference value for efficient aquaculture production and health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40940605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.