ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Family mutuality enhances the family resilience of colorectal cancer patients through positive family functioning.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms underlying the association between perceived recurrence risk and negative emotions in patients with ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mediating effect of family functioning on depressive symptoms and family resilience in dementia caregivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The mediating effect of family resilience between readiness for hospital discharge and self-management efficacy among breast cancer patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo elucidate the influencing factors of family resilience among postoperative colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and how family resilience is affected by family function and mutuality.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 216 postoperative CRC patients were recruited from two Hospitals in Henan Province, China, between February and July 2023. First, we examined the impact of sociodemographic and disease-related factors on family resilience using t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and post hoc comparisons. Given the importance of family coping capacity in postoperative outcomes, we further assessed family resilience, function, and mutuality using the Family Resilience Questionnaire, the Family APGAR Scale (Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, Resolve), and the Mutuality Scale. Finally, we examined the interactions among the three variables through Pearson correlation and the SPSS PROCESS macro.
resultsSix factors were identified as being associated with family resilience among families of postoperative CRC patients, i.e., postoperative duration, education level, marital status, working status, family income, and stoma status. Family resilience was positively correlated with mutuality (r = 0.170 ~ 0.473, p < 0.05) and family function (r = 0.135 ~ 0.451, p < 0.05). Moreover, healthy family mutuality enhanced family resilience, with its effectiveness moderated by family function.
conclusionsBeyond sociodemographic and disease-related factors, this study explored family resilience in CRC patient families from a broader perspective by examining its interaction with family function and mutuality. Our results suggest that healthcare professionals should assess family resilience not only at the individual level but also from the perspective of the whole family, to develop effective interventions that strengthen families' coping and adaptive capacities during postoperative cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40940551What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.