ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2026
The prevention of adult cardiovascular disease must begin in childhood: evidence and imperative.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Paradoxical Trends in Hypertensive Heart Disease: Rising Burden in High-Sociodemographic-Index Regions Despite Healthcare Quality-An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis, 1992-2021.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Pediatric Cardiac Function Staging and Management Recommendations.Pediatric discovery · 2026Article
- The Natural History of Prediabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in the Pediatric Population.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- LDLR variant classification through activity-normalized prime editing screening.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing evidence from the past seven decades indicates that atherosclerosis begins in youth and progresses in response to exposure to cardiovascular risk factors, which contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease in later life. A long-term randomized clinical trial lasting at least 50 years and involving screening and follow-up of children across their lifespan would provide the highest level of evidence to determine the lifelong influence of cardiovascular risk factors on cardiovascular disease risk but such an approach is not feasible. However, much can be learned from observing patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Those patients who were treated at a young age remained event-free into adulthood, beyond the ages at which their affected parent, who initiated treatment at a much later age, experienced their first cardiovascular event. The evidence is less certain for other types of dyslipidaemia and other cardiovascular risk factors, including high blood pressure. Nonetheless, the strategy of waiting until later in adulthood to screen and intervene, often after a non-fatal cardiovascular disease event has already occurred, might no longer seem prudent. In this Review, we summarize the growing body of evidence supporting intensified efforts to identify cardiovascular risk factors in children and young adults, and to identify knowledge gaps among this cohort such as the optimal timing and strategy for blood lipid screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40940549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.