Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Serial recall in spatial acoustic environments: irrelevant sound effect and spatial source alternations.

Cosima A Ermert, Manuj Yadav, John E Marsh, Sabine J Schlittmeier, Torsten W Kuhlen, Janina Fels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cosima A ErmertInstitute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. cosima.ermert@akustik.rwth-aachen.de.
Manuj YadavInstitute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
John E MarshHuman Factors Laboratory, School of Psychology and Humanities, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Sabine J SchlittmeierWork and Engineering Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Torsten W KuhlenVisual Computing Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Janina FelsInstitute for Hearing Technology and Acoustics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated serial recall performance in a complex acoustic scene that included spatialised background sounds and location changes within the target sequence to reflect real-life challenges. The focus is on two effects: the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) and the spatial-source alternation effect (SSAE). Both represent impairment in short-term memory performance of to-be-remembered items: the ISE due to irrelevant background sounds, and the SSAE due to location changes within the target sequence. Although distinct, these effects typically occur together in real-world settings, e.g., listening to multiple speakers in noise, but have not been investigated together yet. Building on the theoretical frameworks of these two effects, this study combines principles from both the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) and the spatial-source alternation effect (SSAE) as a step towards enhancing acoustic complexity in established cognitive tasks. Experiment 1 examined auditory-verbal serial recall using spatially alternating target digits presented at a typical rate (1 item/1 s), with either meaningful or meaningless background speech. Results showed an ISE, with meaningful speech causing greater disruption, but no SSAE - possibly due to either the presentation rate or the spatialised audio scene. To further clarify this, Experiment 2 was conducted with a faster presentation rate (1 item/350 ms) consistent with a previous study, and more spatial target locations (monotic, [Formula: see text]). An SSAE was revealed for all locations. These findings suggest that the SSAE may mainly be modulated by the presentation rate-given the spatial separation is audible and only emergent at rapid location changes-questioning its applicability to naturalistic listening scenarios. As an attempt to bridge the gap between controlled laboratory settings and more complex listening tasks, these findings help explain how cognitive systems manage competing demands in real-world auditory environments, such as separating speech streams in noise.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMemory, Short-TermMental RecallAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleSoundYoung AdultAuditory verbal serial recallIrrelevant sound effectShort-term memorySpatial audioSpatial source alternation effect

Identifiers

PMID40940448
PMCPMC12432121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.