ArticleScientific reports2025
Serial recall in spatial acoustic environments: irrelevant sound effect and spatial source alternations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated serial recall performance in a complex acoustic scene that included spatialised background sounds and location changes within the target sequence to reflect real-life challenges. The focus is on two effects: the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) and the spatial-source alternation effect (SSAE). Both represent impairment in short-term memory performance of to-be-remembered items: the ISE due to irrelevant background sounds, and the SSAE due to location changes within the target sequence. Although distinct, these effects typically occur together in real-world settings, e.g., listening to multiple speakers in noise, but have not been investigated together yet. Building on the theoretical frameworks of these two effects, this study combines principles from both the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) and the spatial-source alternation effect (SSAE) as a step towards enhancing acoustic complexity in established cognitive tasks. Experiment 1 examined auditory-verbal serial recall using spatially alternating target digits presented at a typical rate (1 item/1 s), with either meaningful or meaningless background speech. Results showed an ISE, with meaningful speech causing greater disruption, but no SSAE - possibly due to either the presentation rate or the spatialised audio scene. To further clarify this, Experiment 2 was conducted with a faster presentation rate (1 item/350 ms) consistent with a previous study, and more spatial target locations (monotic, [Formula: see text]). An SSAE was revealed for all locations. These findings suggest that the SSAE may mainly be modulated by the presentation rate-given the spatial separation is audible and only emergent at rapid location changes-questioning its applicability to naturalistic listening scenarios. As an attempt to bridge the gap between controlled laboratory settings and more complex listening tasks, these findings help explain how cognitive systems manage competing demands in real-world auditory environments, such as separating speech streams in noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.