Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940437›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Effectiveness and safety of escitalopram treatment personalized based on therapeutic drug monitoring of drug plasma concentration: a prospective cohort study.

Petar G Vuković, Aleksandra Jeremić, Milica Vezmar, Filip Milosavljević, Zorana Pavlović, Danilo Pešić, Jelena Drakulić Đorđević, Bojana Pejušković, Bojan Marković, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05210140 (Utility of Plasma Drug Level Monitoring and CYP2C19 Genotyping in Dose Personalization of Escitalopram), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05210140 unknown statusnot on this map

Utility of Plasma Drug Level Monitoring and CYP2C19 Genotyping in Dose Personalization of Escitalopram

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BelgradeRan2020 to 2023Enrolled148ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsEscitalopram
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Petar G Vuković *Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade, 11221, Serbia.
Aleksandra Jeremić *Department of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade, 11221, Serbia.
Milica Vezmar *Institute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Filip MilosavljevićDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade, 11221, Serbia.
Zorana PavlovićDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Danilo PešićInstitute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jelena Drakulić ĐorđevićInstitute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Bojana PejuškovićInstitute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Bojan MarkovićDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Magnus Ingelman-SundbergPharmacogenetics section, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Solnavägen 9, Biomedicum B5, 17165, Stockholm, Sweden.
Čedo D MiljevićInstitute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nađa P MarićInstitute of Mental Health, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marin M JukićDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 450, Belgrade, 11221, Serbia. marin.jukic@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first prospective study aiming to quantify the effectiveness and safety of escitalopram monotherapy initiation where therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to achieve the therapeutic reference range (TRR) of plasma concentration. PsyCise-E (NCT05210140) was a hospital-based study conducted in Belgrade, Serbia, involving 92 outpatients with a baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score higher than 13. The primary endpoint was the relative reduction in HAM-D score from baseline to week eight, with dose personalization based on TDM four weeks after treatment initiation. Patients were categorized into groups: (1) unadjusted (they achieved TRR at 10 mg/day), (2) adjusted (their dose was adjusted to achieve TRR) and (3) inadequate (they did not reach TRR). Safety was assessed by the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and QTc interval prolongation. Most patients required a dose escalation beyond 10 mg/day (71/92), and most patients achieved TRR after eight weeks (79/92). The 55% (95% CI: 47-64) reduction in HAM-D scores did not correlate with escitalopram plasma concentrations and did not differ between groups; however, response and remission rates were significantly higher in patients who achieved TRR by week four. The incidence of ADRs (47/92) increased by 3.2% (0.1-6.3) per ng/ml escitalopram, with no significant differences between the groups. QTc prolongation of 5.5 ms (1.8-9.3) did not correlate with plasma concentration and did not differ between groups. While TDM-guided dosing likely only marginally improved escitalopram effectiveness, it increased treatment safety as TDM-guided dose escalation did not lead to ADRs or QTc prolongation.

Indexed as

CitalopramDepressionDrug MonitoringEscitalopramPrecision MedicineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeCitalopramEscitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsClinical effectivenessDepressionDose personalizationEscitalopramTherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40940437
PMCPMC12432241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.