Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning prediction models for mode of delivery in prolonged pregnancies in Sweden.

Stefanie Schmauder, Anna Sandström, Magnus Boman, Christian Martin, Olof Stephansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie SchmauderClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. stefanie.schmauder@ki.se.
Anna SandströmClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Magnus BomanClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christian MartinCenter for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (ScaDS.AI), Dresden/Leipzig, Germany.
Olof StephanssonClinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induction of labour and not "expectant management" is often recommended to prevent adverse perinatal outcomes in late-term pregnancies, but no prognostic prediction model exists for an individualized decision-making. The present study used a data-driven approach to predict mode of delivery at or beyond 41 gestational weeks considering the obstetric management. Low-risk nulliparous women were derived from the nationwide Swedish Medical Birth Register (1998-2019). A two-day-wise prediction in four study groups with increasing gestational age (e.g. group 1: induced at 41

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricLabor, InducedMachine LearningPregnancy, ProlongedAdultBayes TheoremCesarean SectionFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRegistriesSupport Vector MachineSwedenExpectant managementInduction of labourLate-term pregnanciesMachine learningObstetricsRegister data

Identifiers

PMID40940432
PMCPMC12432169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.