ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainable production of intermetallic nanocomposites from aluminum and iron scarp, with excellent tribo-mechanical and thermal properties for industrial applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upcycling waste iron into high-performance FeScientific reports · 2026Article
- Boosting tribo-mechanical, thermal expansion and electrical performance of waste polytetrafluoroethylene using high-strength carbide ceramics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this research is to convert iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) waste from metal workshops, as well as silicon (Si), into innovative intermetallic nanocomposites with different characteristics that are reinforced with various quantities of hybrid fly ash and vanadium carbide (VC) for industrial usage. The microstructure, physical integrity, tribo-mechanical performance, and thermal behavior of the resultant sintered materials were all carefully examined. FeSi, FeAl, Fe₃Si, and Fe₃Al₂Si₃ were among the intermetallic phases that were formed, according to post-milling XRD examination. The bulk density of the intermetallic alloy steadily dropped as the amount of hybrid ceramic reinforcements rose, although the apparent porosity in the sintered microstructure increased. Notably, as compared to the unreinforced intermetallic alloy, the microhardness increased by 8.11%, 23.62%, 47.10%, and 84.26% in quick succession when these reinforcements were added. In comparison to the intermetallic alloy, the sample containing 16 vol% of hybrid reinforcements (FV8) achieved a Young's modulus of 84.1% and a compressive strength of 43.2% after the addition of reinforcements. The CTE value of the intermetallic alloy was 11.88 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.