ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of nighttime odor exposure and delivery methods on subjective sleep quality in healthy adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of smell in improving sleep quality is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate whether the type of odor and the method of application affect sleep quality. Based on individual preference 112 healthy participants (mean age ± SD = 31 ± 12 years, 43 men) selected an odor (lavender, orange, specifically designed "perfume") and an application method (odorized nasal clips, odors on pillow, odors through diffuser). Their performance was compared to a control group (n = 19; mean age ± SD = 29 ± 6 years, 9 men). Except for the control group, all groups slept with exposure of odor for 2 weeks (phase 1), followed by 2 more weeks of normal sleep without odors (phase 2). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the wearable sleep monitoring device "Fitbit Charge 2" were used to measure sleep quality both subjectively and objectively. After adjusting for baseline differences, participants exposed to "perfume" reported better subjective sleep quality during the odor exposure phase compared to the control group. Among the application evaluated, the use of a diffuser was associated with better subjective sleep quality and reduced daytime fatigue, as reflected in the PSQI components. No significant group differences were observed in objective sleep parameters measured by Fitbit. Exposure to odors during the night influence sleep quality. Using a diffuser to deliver the odor appears to be associated with better subjective sleep quality and reduced daytime fatigue. No sustained improvement in sleep quality over time was observed with odor exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.