ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving electrocoagulation performance by adding environmentally friendly materials.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parametric study on electro-coagulation for efficient removal of microplastics from reverse osmosis wastewater.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the enhancement of electrocoagulation (EC) treatment of wastewater by adding mucilage extracted from Egyptian taro (Colocasia esculenta). EC is an efficient, eco-friendly method for removing pollutants such as total dissolved solids, total suspended solids (TSS), color, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) from wastewater. The research explores the effects of different operational parameters, including applied voltage, treatment time, and pH, on the efficiency of EC using iron/aluminum electrodes. Mucilage was added as an environmentally friendly additive to enhance removal efficiency. The study used a laboratory-scale setup with kinetic and thermodynamic analyses to evaluate the removal mechanisms. Results indicate that the addition of mucilage improved COD removal, while other parameters like color and TSS were better without additives. The findings demonstrate that mucilage can be a potential enhancer in wastewater treatment, with the Langmuir and Freundlich models applied to describe the adsorption process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.