ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of chewing muscle anesthesia on masticatory performance in healthy participants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of the muscle spindles in the masticatory performance remains elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of local anesthesia in the jaw-closing muscles on masticatory performance in healthy participants. Thirty healthy pain-free volunteers underwent in two rounds of chewing tasks involving two types of viscoelastic candies and a two-coloured chewing gum. Lidocaine (3.0 mL) was injected into a total of six points in the masseter and temporalis muscles bilaterally for the second round. Pain intensity, fatigue, the number and area of particles, and the degree of mixing of the chewing gum were assessed at baseline and after each round of chewing. The number of candy particles after injection of lidocaine, was significantly lower (33%) for women compared to the results without anesthesia (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the variance of hue of the two-coloured chewing-gum when comparing values before and after anesthesia. None of the participants experienced any pain during the experiment. However, self-reported fatigue increased during the second round, i.e., after anesthesia, with significantly higher values observed at the final assessment point. (p = 0.029). Local anesthesia of the jaw-closing muscles appears to impair the masticatory function in women, leading to reduced efficiency in food comminution compared to normal mastication. The observed sex differences suggest that women may be more vulnerable to neuromuscular control alterations following sensory alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.