ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2025
Retaining family physicians in comprehensive primary care: Scoping review.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Why Are Family Physicians Leaving Comprehensive Care? A Qualitative Study on Retention in Ontario.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
- To stay or leave: an integrative review of factors, personas, and recommendations for retaining family physicians in Canada.BMC primary care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify evidence of strategies, initiatives, or policies in the literature aimed at retention of family physicians in comprehensive family practice. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost) and grey literature sources were searched for relevant articles published from 2000 to February 17, 2023, with study participants that included family physicians and general practitioners in comprehensive primary care practice. Retention strategies, initiatives, and policies were the primary concepts identified. STUDY SELECTION: Independent title and abstract screening and full-text assessment were completed using Covidence software, with conflicts discussed between 2 reviewers. This was followed by thematic analysis to identify themes and synthesize evidence. Twenty-three articles that described strategies for retaining primary care physicians in practices were selected. Most studies were conducted in the United States, Canada, and Australia, with a few in each of Brazil, Japan, and in 2 European countries (18 using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches with the remaining 5 articles being case descriptions or letters to the editor). SYNTHESIS: Five categories of retention strategies were identified: embedding in medical training, community integration, financial support, professional and personal supports, and organizational environment. Early exposure for medical students and residents to rural or underserved communities through distributed medical education, and integration within a community that encouraged the development of ties both professionally and personally both had a positive impact on retention. Supports including financial incentives, professional growth opportunities, and organizations that fostered collaboration among family physicians were also seen to encourage long-term practices.
conclusionMore research is needed to identify effective strategies or policies aimed at retaining family physicians in comprehensive care practice and to foster healthy and productive careers for professionals who may desire to exit earlier than intended due to systemic issues. Governments need to focus on retaining well-educated and dedicated doctors and encourage lifelong careers in comprehensive family medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.