Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40940057›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Co-creating and testing a self-management digital solution for bladder health and urinary continence among people aged 50 and over: protocol for the international KOKU Bladder project.

Javier Jerez-Roig, Oscar Aguila-Gimeno, Marius Brazaitis, Rima Solianik, Erika Karkauskienė, Laura Jarutienė, Andrea Fuente-Vidal, Eva Borralleras-Fumaña, Norina Gasteiger, Emma Stanmore

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06583733 (On Any Page, Select Quit to Stop Entering Data. Data Entered on Previous Pages Will be Retained), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06583733 narecruitingnot on this map

On Any Page, Select Quit to Stop Entering Data. Data Entered on Previous Pages Will be Retained: To Complete Data Entry Later, Open the Record From the Home Page

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Vic - Central University of CataloniaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsUrinary Incontinence in Old AgeArmsKOKU Bladder, recommendations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Javier Jerez-Roig *Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain javier.jerez@uvic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1968-4452
Oscar Aguila-Gimeno *Research group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.
Marius BrazaitisInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Rima SolianikInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Erika KarkauskienėInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Laura JarutienėInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Andrea Fuente-VidalResearch group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare, Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Vic, Spain.
Eva Borralleras-FumañaHospital Universitari de Vic, Vic, Spain.
Norina GasteigerDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7801-7417
Emma StanmoreInstitute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-5292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ageing population in Europe is experiencing a significant rise in urinary incontinence (UI), which affects millions and incurs substantial healthcare costs. While conservative treatment (eg, behavioural strategies, pelvic floor exercises) can help manage UI, there is a need for evidence-based eHealth solutions to improve adherence and treatment outcomes. The KOKU Bladder project aims to co-create, develop and test an eHealth intervention to improve bladder health (BH) and UI in adults aged 50 and over. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Phase 1 will consist of the co-creation and technological development of the eHealth solution. First, a rapid review will be undertaken to identify eHealth solutions (ie, technologies and websites), including behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and elements of gamification for self-management of BH and UI in adults aged 50 and over. Also, a consultation with eight experts on BH/UI and/or BCTs will be conducted to explore recommendations for the new eHealth solution. The PROSECO framework will facilitate an assessment of the co-creation process. Phase 1 will additionally include the conduction of at least six focus groups, to be held in Kaunas (Lithuania), Catalonia (Spain) and Manchester (UK) to co-create the contents of the digital solution. Each focus group will include 10-12 community-dwelling adults aged 50+, with different physical conditions and continence status, as well as health professionals and other stakeholders. The information collected will be analysed thematically. First, we will hold three focus groups, one in each country, to find out the opinion of the participants. Once the focus groups are finished and the first version of the technological solution is created, participants will test it and provide feedback in three additional focus groups. Participants' opinions will be taken into account to make modifications to the solution and co-create the final version. Gamification methods and the Honeycomb model for user experience will be followed in order to achieve a technological solution that is adequate for its target population.Phase 2 will consist of a multicentre pilot study with a mixed method (quantitative and qualitative) approach to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the newly developed technological solution. At least 120 participants (40 per country) will be recruited and randomised into two groups: intervention (KOKU Bladder) and control (indirect health education). The primary outcome will be the severity of UI, according to the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-UI short form. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, 5-Level), life-impact related to UI (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7), lower urinary tract symptoms (Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index-10 (LURN SI-10)), International Consultation Questionnaire on Incontinence Bowel Score, Patient Global Impression of Improvement; levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour (accelerometer), as well as satisfaction with treatment (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)). The latter, together with recruitment, adherence, retention, attrition and data loss, will be used for measuring intervention feasibility and acceptability. Statistical and clinical significance, as well as effect size, will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The project is approved by the Research Ethics Committee of IRIS-CC approved the project on 9 January 2025 (code 24/095), the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova of Lleida on 27 January 2025 (CEIC-3201), the Commission on Research Ethics of Lithuania on 3 March 2025 (SMTEK-31) and the Research Ethics Committee 3 of the University of Manchester on 13 August 2025 (2025-23619-43258). Participation and withdrawal will be voluntary. Informed consent will be obtained from candidates willing to join the project. Study results will be disseminated via publication of scientific articles, presentations at professional workshops, webinars and congresses, as well as through social media and lay summaries for participants and the general public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06583733. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024597624.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementUrinary IncontinenceAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicineAgingDigital TechnologyeHealthFeasibility StudiesGYNAECOLOGYUROLOGY

Identifiers

PMID40940057
PMCPMC12519342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.