ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2026
Mapping transposon insertion sites within bacterial genomes by direct Sanger sequencing.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial biomedical research frequently involves mutagenesis by insertion of transposons into the genome. Currently, transposon insertion locations are typically elucidated by Next Generation Sequencing or by Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Here, transposons were located by direct Sanger sequencing of bacterial genomic DNA from both Salmonella enterica (Gram-negative) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive) cultures. DNA was prepared by shearing to a modal size of ∼2 kb followed by purification by paramagnetic beads. Sequencing reactions involved relatively minor modifications of standard protocols (e.g., extra sequencing polymerase, 75-100 PCR cycles); completed reactions were cleaned by ethanol-EDTA precipitation. Reads were generated on the ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer using 50-cm capillary arrays and a run protocol modified for extra sample injection time. Good quality reads of ∼500-800 nt were routinely generated; BLAST results returned nearly 100% matches to genomes in the NCBI database. As implemented, the optimized protocol (post-DNA extraction) could be performed within an 8-h workday (with sequencing results the following day) for ∼$10 (USD) per sequencing reaction. Although this method was developed to locate transposons inserted into bacterial genomes, it seems likely that it can be extended to generate sequence data from even native single-copy genes from small genomes (e.g., <5 Mb).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.