Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40939623›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Acceptability of Active and Passive Data Collection Methods for Mobile Health Research: Cross-Sectional Survey of an Online Adult Sample in the United States.

Nelson Roque, John Felt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nelson RoqueCenter for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, 422 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA, 16801, United States, 1 814-863-7502.ORCID 0000-0003-1184-202X
John FeltCenter for Healthy Aging, The Pennsylvania State University, 422 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA, 16801, United States, 1 814-863-7502.ORCID 0000-0002-7334-6489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Digital health technologies, including wearable devices and app-based cognitive and health assessments, are pervasive and crucial to better understanding important public health problems (eg, Alzheimer's disease and related dementias). Central to understanding mechanisms driving individuals' willingness to share various data streams are concerns regarding data privacy, security, and control over generated data. Objective: This survey was designed to learn more about attitudes and opinions related to digital health technologies and the sharing of associated data. Methods: A total of 1509 adults were recruited from Prolific to complete an online survey via Qualtrics. Of these, 1489 participants provided valid data for analyses. Participants completed a structured survey consisting of multiple modules after informed consent was provided. These included: (1) demographic characteristics; (2) prior research experience; (3) mobility factors (eg, use of mobility aids, driving frequency); (4) technology ownership (eg, smartphones, tablets, home Wi-Fi); (5) social media use (eg, frequency of engagement with platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok); (6) willingness to contribute different types of data across categories, including activities, sensors, and metadata; (7) opinions about data control and privacy options (eg, data deletion, stream-specific control); and (8) willingness to interact with assistive technologies such as robots, for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Results: The final cohort (N=1489) had a mean age of 35.5 years (SD 12.0), was 44% female (n=652), and predominantly identified as White (76%, n=1134), with high rates of smartphone ownership (99%, n=1479) and home Wi-Fi access (98%, n=1464). Participants were most willing to share data streams with clear health implications and least willing to share data streams with greater privacy or reidentification potential (eg, GPS location, in-vehicle dashcam footage). On average, people were willing to complete ambulatory cognitive assessments for 56.7 (SD 36.2) days, air quality monitoring for 58.1 (SD 37.7) days, and GPS location monitoring for 37 (SD 39.0) days. People expected control over their data, including the ability to delete all or specific streams of the data contributed for research. Most participants prioritized control over their data, with 71% (n=1061) favoring the ability to delete all data contributed for research purposes. Stream-specific data deletion (65%, n=960) and time-specific deletion (44%, n=653) were also valued; interest in sharing data with insurance providers (30%, n=453) or caregivers (26%, n=384) was notably lower. Conclusions: Findings have implications for the design of digital health technologies and education-related to the use and implications of collected data.

Indexed as

Data CollectionTelemedicineAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultacceptabilityattitudesdata privacydigital health technologiesmHealthmobile healthonline surveyopinionsprivacyquestionnairessensorssmartphonessurveys

Identifiers

PMID40939623
PMCPMC12431785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.