ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2025
Effects of ultrasonic pretreatment on physicochemical properties and drying behavior of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Eucalyptus grandis × urophylla.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasonic treatment offers promising potential for improving wood drying efficiency and permeability, yet its effects on the coordinated structural and drying responses of different species remain underexplored. This study assessed the impact of 1-5 h ultrasonic treatments (320 W, 40 kHz) on the physicochemical properties, pore structure, permeability, and drying behavior of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Eucalyptus grandis × urophylla. Results showed that ultrasonic pretreatment did not alter cellulose crystallinity type but reduced crystallinity and free hydroxyl content, while increasing mass loss, microfibril angle, and hygroscopic dimensional stability. With increasing treatment time, cell double wall thickness initially decreased and then stabilized, and Shore hardness declined across all three sections. SEM and MIP analyses revealed that ultrasound gradually disrupted pit membranes, increased the proportion of macro- and mesopores, total pore volume, and porosity, thereby enhancing gas permeability. Treatments of 1-4 h showed the most significant improvements, while excessive treatment (5 h) led to structural collapse or pore closure. Permeability was enhanced by up to about 63 % and 60 % in radial and tangential directions of C. lanceolata, and by about 42 % and 33 % in E. grandis, respectively. Drying time was shortened, and drying rate and diffusion coefficient were increased, while volumetric shrinkage was reduced. Drying rates were raised by about 10 % and 13 % after 2 h (C. lanceolata) and 4 h (E. grandis) treatments, respectively. However, bound water was found to be less responsive to ultrasonic stimulation than free water. These findings provide a theoretical and practical basis for optimizing ultrasonic parameters to improve the drying performance and permeability modification of fast-growing plantation wood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.