Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40939175›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025

Interventions Based on Biofeedback Systems to Improve Workers' Psychological Well-Being, Mental Health, and Safety: Systematic Literature Review.

Simão Ferreira, Matilde A Rodrigues, Catarina Mateus, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, Nuno Barbosa Rocha

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simão FerreiraRISE-Health, Center for Translational Health and Medical Biotechnology Research, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8233-2217
Matilde A RodriguesRISE-Health, Center for Translational Health and Medical Biotechnology Research, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-6934
Catarina MateusRISE-Health, Center for Translational Health and Medical Biotechnology Research, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-5049
Pedro Pereira RodriguesHealth Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7867-6682
Nuno Barbosa RochaRISE-Health, Center for Translational Health and Medical Biotechnology Research, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-2786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn modern, high-speed work settings, the significance of mental health disorders is increasingly acknowledged as a pressing health issue, with potential adverse consequences for organizations, including reduced productivity and increased absenteeism. Over the past few years, various mental health management solutions, such as biofeedback applications, have surfaced as promising avenues to improve employees' mental well-being. However, most studies on these interventions have been conducted in controlled laboratory settings.

objectiveThis review aimed to systematically identify and analyze studies that implemented biofeedback-based interventions in real-world occupational settings, focusing on their effectiveness in improving psychological well-being and mental health.

methodsA systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched PubMed and EBSCO databases for studies published between 2012 and 2024. Inclusion criteria were original peer-reviewed studies that focused on employees and used biofeedback interventions to improve mental health or prevent mental illness. Exclusion criteria included nonemployee samples, lack of a description of the intervention, and low methodological quality (assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database [PEDro] checklist). Data were extracted on study characteristics, intervention type, physiological and self-reported outcomes, and follow-up measures. Risk of bias was assessed, and VOSviewer was used to visualize the distribution of research topics.

resultsA total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. The interventions used a range of delivery methods, including traditional biofeedback, mobile apps, mindfulness techniques, virtual reality, and cerebral blood flow monitoring. Most studies focused on breathing techniques to regulate physiological responses (eg, heart rate variability and respiratory sinus arrhythmia) and showed reductions in stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Mobile and app-directed interventions appeared particularly promising for improving resilience and facilitating recovery after stress. Of the 9 studies, 8 (89%) reported positive outcomes, with 1 (11%) study showing initial increases in stress due to logistical limitations in biofeedback access. Sample sizes were generally small, and long-term follow-up data were limited.

conclusionsBiofeedback interventions in workplace settings show promising short-term results in reducing stress and improving mental health, particularly when incorporating breathing techniques and user-friendly delivery methods such as mobile apps. However, the field remains underexplored in occupational contexts. Future research should address adherence challenges, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes to support broader implementation of biofeedback as a sustainable workplace mental health strategy.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyMental HealthOccupational HealthHumansMental DisordersPsychological Well-Beingbiofeedbackbreathing techniquesmental healthoccupational healthoccupational safetywell-being

Identifiers

PMID40939175
PMCPMC12475886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.