ArticleJMIR mental health2025
Cross-Site Predictions of Readmission After Psychiatric Hospitalization With Mood or Psychotic Disorders: Retrospective Study.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a clinical prediction model and risk score for 30-day psychiatric readmission in the United Arab Emirates.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Cost Burden, Readmission Dynamics, and Service Management in Psychiatric Care: A Financial Performance Analysis in a Romanian Public Hospital.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predictors of psychiatric readmission within 12 months following discharge from inpatient units in Alberta, Canada.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Aspect-Oriented Summarization for Psychiatric Short-Term Readmission Prediction.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with mood or psychotic disorders experience high rates of unplanned hospital readmissions. Predicting the likelihood of readmission can guide discharge decisions and optimize patient care. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive power of structured variables from electronic health records for all-cause readmission across multiple sites within the Mass General Brigham health system and to assess the transportability of prediction models between sites. Methods: This retrospective, multisite study analyzed structured variables from electronic health records separately for each site to develop in-site prediction models. The transportability of these models was evaluated by applying them across different sites. Predictive performance was measured using the F1-score, and additional adjustments were made to account for differences in predictor distributions. Results: The study found that the relevant predictors of readmission varied significantly across sites. For instance, length of stay was a strong predictor at only 3 of the 4 sites. In-site prediction models achieved an average F1-score of 0.661, whereas cross-site predictions resulted in a lower average F1-score of 0.616. Efforts to improve transportability by adjusting for differences in predictor distributions did not improve performance. Conclusions: The findings indicate that individual site-specific models are necessary to achieve reliable prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the results suggest that the current set of predictors may be insufficient for cross-site model transportability, highlighting the need for more advanced predictor variables and predictive algorithms to gain robust insights into the factors influencing early psychiatric readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.