Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40939065›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

Machine Learning for Preoperative Assessment and Postoperative Prediction in Cervical Cancer: Multicenter Retrospective Model Integrating MRI and Clinicopathological Data.

Shuqi Li, Chenyan Guo, Yufei Fang, Junjun Qiu, He Zhang, Lei Ling, Jie Xu, Xinwei Peng, Chuchu Jiang, Jue Wang and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuqi Li *Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0009-0007-4467-6773
Chenyan Guo *Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0000-0003-1203-5705
Yufei Fang *Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Academy of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3031-6623
Junjun Qiu *Shanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0000-0002-2063-2684
He ZhangShanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0000-0003-3782-1411
Lei LingShanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0009-0007-5122-1478
Jie XuShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9233-4363
Xinwei PengShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-0136
Chuchu JiangShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0009-8800-8202
Jue WangShanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-8219
Keqin HuaShanghai Key Lab of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Shanghai Key Lab of Reproduction and Development, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, 218 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200433, China, 86 021 33189900.ORCID 0000-0002-4546-5229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly applied to cervical cancer (CC) research. However, few studies have combined both clinical parameters and imaging data. At the same time, there remains an urgent need for more robust and accurate preoperative assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis, as well as postoperative prognosis prediction. Objective: The objective of this study is to develop an integrated ML model combining clinicopathological variables and magnetic resonance image features for (1) preoperative parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis detection and (2) postoperative recurrence and survival prediction. Methods: Retrospective data from 250 patients with CC (2014-2022; 2 tertiary hospitals) were analyzed. Variables were assessed for their predictive value regarding parametrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, survival, and recurrence using 7 ML models: K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine, decision tree, random forest (RF), balanced RF, weighted DT, and weighted KNN. Performance was assessed via 5-fold cross-validation using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The optimal models were deployed in an artificial intelligence-assisted contouring and prognosis prediction system. Results: Among 250 women, there were 11 deaths and 24 recurrences. (1) For preoperative evaluation, the integrated model using balanced RF achieved optimal performance (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 0.85) for parametrial invasion, while weighted KNN achieved the best performance for lymph node metastasis (sensitivity 0.98, AUC 0.72). (2) For postoperative prognosis, weighted KNN also demonstrated high accuracy for recurrence (accuracy 0.94, AUC 0.86) and mortality (accuracy 0.97, AUC 0.77), with relatively balanced sensitivity of 0.80 and 0.33, respectively. (3) An artificial intelligence-assisted contouring and prognosis prediction system was developed to support preoperative evaluation and postoperative prognosis prediction. Conclusions: The integration of clinical data and magnetic resonance images provides enhanced diagnostic capability to preoperatively detect parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis detection and prognostic capability to predict recurrence and mortality for CC, facilitating personalized, precise treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative CarePreoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective Studiescervical cancerdiagnostic modelintegrated prediction modelmachine learningmultimodal integrationprognosis prediction model

Identifiers

PMID40939065
PMCPMC12431160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.