Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40939010›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Variation in the geometry of concept manifolds across human visual cortex.

Ghislain St-Yves, Kendrick Kay, Thomas Naselaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ghislain St-YvesDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0004-9760-0105
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-9155
Thomas NaselarisDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0004-4041-3157

Funding

Seen and mental images in visual cortexR01EY023384 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HERMES, DORA, NASELARIS, THOMAS P · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
Deep sampling of cognitive effects in the human visual systemR01EY034118 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLAYTON E CURTIS, Kendrick Norris Kay · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023384NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain activity patterns in high-level visual cortex support accurate linear classification of visual concepts (e.g., objects or scenes). It has long been appreciated that the accuracy of linear classification in any brain area depends on the geometry of its concept manifolds-sets of brain activity patterns that encode images of a concept. However, it is unclear how the geometry of concept manifolds differs between regions of visual cortex that support accurate classification and those that don't, or how it differs between visual cortex and deep neural networks (DNNs). We estimated geometric properties of concept manifolds that, per a recent theory, directly determine the accuracy of simple "few-shot" linear classifiers. Using a large fMRI dataset, we show that variation in classification accuracy across human visual cortex is driven by a variation in a single geometric property: the distance between manifold centers ("geometric Signal"). In contrast, variation in classification accuracy across early and mid DNN layers is driven by an increase in the effective number of manifold dimensions ("Dimensionality"). Despite this difference in the geometric properties that affect few-shot classification performance in the brain and DNNs, we find that Signal and Dimensionality are strongly, negatively correlated: when Signal increases across brain regions or DNN layers, Dimensionality decreases, and vice versa. We conclude that early visual cortical areas and DNN layers deploy different geometric strategies for accurate linear classification of concepts, even though both are subject to the same constraint.

Indexed as

Visual CortexAdultBrain MappingComputational BiologyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40939010
PMCPMC12445742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.