Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40939008›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Competition and cooperation of assembly sequences in recurrent neural networks.

Tristan Manfred Stöber, Andrew B Lehr, Arash Nikzad, Mohammad Ganjtabesh, Marianne Fyhn, Arvind Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Conditions for replay of neuronal assemblies.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tristan Manfred StöberInstitute for Neural Computation, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3853-0608
Andrew B LehrCentre for Integrative Neuroplasticity, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Arash NikzadDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad GanjtabeshDepartment of Computer Science, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Marianne FyhnCentre for Integrative Neuroplasticity, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Arvind KumarSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorwegian Ministry of Education and ResearchResearch Council of NorwaySwedish Research CouncilUniversity of Oslo and Simula Research Laboratories
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity sequences are ubiquitous in the brain and play pivotal roles in functions such as long-term memory formation and motor control. While conditions for storing and reactivating individual sequences have been thoroughly characterized, it remains unclear how multiple sequences may interact when activated simultaneously in recurrent neural networks. This question is especially relevant for weak sequences, comprised of fewer neurons, competing against strong sequences. Using a non-linear rate -based and a spiking model with discrete, pre-configured assemblies, we demonstrate that weak sequences can compensate for their competitive disadvantage either by increasing excitatory connections between subsequent assemblies or by cooperating with other co-active sequences. Further, our models suggest that such cooperation can negatively affect sequence speed unless subsequently active assemblies are paired. Our analysis characterizes the conditions for successful sequence progression in isolated, competing, and cooperating assembly sequences, and identifies the distinct contributions of recurrent and feed-forward projections. This proof-of-principle study shows how even disadvantaged sequences can be prioritized for reactivation, a process which has recently been implicated in hippocampal memory processing.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerAction PotentialsAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHippocampusHumansMemoryNeuronsRecurrent Neural Networks

Identifiers

PMID40939008
PMCPMC12469390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.