ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Task-relevant representational spaces in human memory traces.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During encoding, stimuli are embedded into memory traces that allow for their later retrieval. However, we cannot remember every aspect of our experiences. Here, we show that memory traces consist of multidimensional representational spaces whose formats are flexibly strengthened or weakened during encoding and consolidation. In a series of behavioral experiments, participants compared pairs of natural images on either two conceptual or two perceptual dimensions, leading them to incorporate the images into representational 'spaces'. We found that representations from deep neural networks relate to both behavioral similarity and memory confidence judgements. Furthermore, we found that distances in task-relevant but not irrelevant spaces affected memory strengths. Interestingly, conceptual encoding did not impair subsequent rejection of similar lures, suggesting that task-irrelevant perceptual information remained in the memory trace. However, targeted memory reactivation following conceptual encoding deteriorated perceptual discrimination, indicating that it weakened the accessibility of perceptual formats. Our results demonstrate that representational formats are flexibly incorporated into memory, and more generally show how the organization of information in cognitive representational spaces shapes behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.