ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of opaque porcelain on color and aesthetic outcomes of titanium-abutment implant restorations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluated the effects of opaque porcelain (OP) on color parameters and aesthetic outcomes of all-ceramic implant restorations with varying abutment types and restoration thicknesses.
methodsFour types of zirconia discs were fabricated:(A) 1.5 mm zirconia; (B) 1.4 mm zirconia + 0.1 mm OP; (C) 2.0 mm zirconia; (D) 1.9 mm zirconia + 0.1 mm OP. These discs were bonded to titanium (t) or all-ceramic (c) backgrounds to form At, Ac, Bt, Bc, Ct, Cc, Dt, and Dc specimens,to simulate the aesthetic results of implant restorations with or without OP on titanium or all-ceramic abutments. The assembled specimens were placed at the center of a dark backboard in a specialized constructed photography platform, and a professional camera was used to acquire images of the specimens. Eight regions of interest on the image were selected, and color parameters in the form of L*, a*, and b* values and variations determined via the CIELAB color measurement system were analyzed using Adobe Photoshop software.Color differences (ΔE) between samples were quantified. Statistical comparisons of color parameters were conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and Welch's t-test.
resultsThere were significant differences in L*, a*, and b* between all-ceramic and titanium backgrounds in all types of zirconia specimens (p < 0.001). The application of OP influenced the brightness and chroma of zirconia restorations on titanium backgrounds. ΔE values between restorations with metal substrate and OP, and those with all-ceramic substrate but without OP, (△E (Ac/Bt)= 1.99 ± 0.86; △E(Cc/Dt)= 1.31 ± 0.83) indicated that OP effectively mitigated the color compromise caused by metallic implant abutments. The greater the thickness of the restoration, the smaller the color difference caused by the titanium background.
conclusionThis study revealed that titanium abutments can affect the color of implant-supported restorations. The application of OP on restorations reduces the titanium abutment's color impact, and this effect improves with increased zirconia thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.