Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40938947›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Default mode network connectivity predicts individual differences in long-term forgetting: Evidence for storage degradation, not retrieval failure.

Yinan Xu, Chantel S Prat, Florian Sense, Hedderik van Rijn, Andrea Stocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yinan XuDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washinton, United States of America.
Chantel S PratDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washinton, United States of America.
Florian SenseDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hedderik van RijnDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Andrea StoccoDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washinton, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8919-3934

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-19-1-0299Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of memories in everyday life and the progress made in understanding how they are encoded and retrieved, the neural processes by which declarative memories are maintained or forgotten remain elusive. Part of the problem is that it is empirically difficult to measure the rate at which memories fade, even between repeated presentations of the source of the memory. Without such a ground-truth measure, it is hard to identify the corresponding neural correlates. This study addresses this problem by comparing individual patterns of functional connectivity against behavioral differences in forgetting speed derived from computational phenotyping. Specifically, the individual-specific values of the speed of forgetting in long-term memory (LTM) were estimated for 33 participants using a formal model fit to accuracy and response time data from an adaptive paired-associate learning task. Individual speeds of forgetting were then used to examine participant-specific patterns of resting-state fMRI connectivity, using machine learning techniques to identify the most predictive and generalizable features. Our results show that individual speeds of forgetting are associated with resting-state connectivity within the default mode network (DMN) as well as between the DMN and cortical sensory areas. Cross-validation showed that individual speeds of forgetting were predicted with high accuracy (r = .77) from these connectivity patterns alone. These results support the view that DMN activity and the associated sensory regions are actively involved in maintaining memories and preventing their decline, a view that can be seen as evidence for the hypothesis that forgetting is a result of storage degradation, rather than of retrieval failure.

Indexed as

Default Mode NetworkMemory, Long-TermAdultBrainComputational BiologyFemaleHumansIndividualityMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallModels, NeurologicalNerve NetYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40938947
PMCPMC12448966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.